Saturday, 9 May 2020

American War of Independence Commanders & New Sabot Bases


It was way back at the end of October last year that I last posted on my AWI Niagara-Mohawk Campaign collection of figures when I presented the last addition to the collection which were my Butler's Rangers conversions and a selection of Iroquois Indians, before Warlord Games launched their 1:700th range of Napoleonic ships that set me off on another tangent to build a quite different collection.

AWI - Butler's Rangers & Iroquois Indians
AWI -British Light Infantry
AWI - Kings Royal Regiment of New York

The Burning of the Valleys, by Gavin K. Watt provided the inspiration to work on my AWI Collection and the cover artwork captures the look of the British and Allied troops that fought along the Niagara-Mohawk frontier, that I wanted with my general officers 


As well as just indulging myself by 'sailing off'', if you'll excuse the pun, on another project, the ship building allowed me to pause on the AWI collection as I considered how I wanted to base my figures using an appropriate sabot set up.


This portrait of Sir John Johnson provided the inspiration for the look of my
sword waving British General Officer dressed in 1760's style dress regulation, rather than the more 
campaign style dress code of his likely subordinates, seen worn by the other general officers.


This plan incorporated the rather nice sabots from  Supreme Littleness Designs (SLD), who uniquely offer sabots with card rather than mdf bases, giving them a much reduced profile and with their irregular cut edges, a more softened look on the table.

Until recently SLD had been reorganising their business, which entailed their ordering page to be deactivated during the process, and so I took the time to focus on ships during that time and as soon as they were available ordered up the new bases together with some pill bases for my mounted commanders for which I had painted the figures in early November but were unbased and not ready to show.


I really like the SLD Command sabots that allow a space at the back to place an identifier marking to make spotting a particular commander on the table that bit easier but keeping things relatively unobtrusive and I had used them before with my Augustus to Aurelian collection of Romano-Dacians.

Command Sabot Bases for Augustus to Aurelian


The bases are marked up in a similar style to the command chits used in Sharp Practice and help make the relevant commander stand out from his units.


The mounted British commanders are completed to represent Royal Regiment of New York senior officers together with Sir John Johnson, Officer commanding on the Niagra Frontier and as well as my foot commands for my Rangers and Indians I now have 'Mad Dog' mounted, wearing his Seven Years War British Colonel's jacket and tricorne.




As well as the British and their Indian allies, I have started to put the first parts of the American part of the collection together with my mounted American Militia general officers, suitably adorned in a mix of military and civilian garb and the infantry I put together for a Devon Wargames Group club game have been rebased ready to join others when I get the opportunity to add them over time.


The look of my American militia units and their commanders will take inspiration from pictures such as this of the defenders of Breeds Hill by Don Troiani


The Perry militia officers are such a nice set of sculpts and will add lots of character to my American army of State and colonial militiamen.




However with Spanish naval reinforcements ordered up and two other projects to get done before they arrive, I will turn my attention next to the medieval period with some Perry plastic 28mm hobilars currently underway that I am painting for a friend.

More Anon 
JJ

Friday, 8 May 2020

Wargame Blogs - What's that all about then?



It's really nice to see the start of something new and in this case have the opportunity to welcome Greg and his brand spanking new blog 'Delta Coy'  to the world of wargame blogging.

I myself have been doing this now for a few years, here and on the Devon Wargames Group club blog, and it's easy to forget what it felt like getting into this interesting aspect of the hobby and taking a bit of time to just reflect on why, for some of us, it becomes a big part of what we do in the hobby, just as much as playing the games, painting the miniatures, attending shows (Ah, those were the days!), reading the books and exploring historical sites and places; in fact if anything, for me, it acts as a hub to all of that activity and yet for others they seem to enter the space, say what they want to say for a while, and then step off the stage seemingly having said all they wanted or needed to, which is just as it should be.

The inspiration for this post came about after a series of email exchanges with Greg based down in the larger part of the Antipodes, via JJ's Wargames, that ended up on the subject of blogging in general followed later by the launch of Delta Coy, which I think had been brewing in the background for a lot longer than our email exchange, but either way, I think it is a great time to be blogging in the hobby and great to see a new voice step on to the stage.  

It has struck me in recent times that perhaps blogging was not as fashionable as perhaps it was a few years ago with the rise of other platforms on the web, such as Facebook and others, that has seemed to draw in manufacturers and followers of one particular rule set or era, to set up a particular page and gather around. This trend even seemed to be affecting the traffic seen on other established wargame forums where a lot of that activity and discussion had been based but seemingly not so much any more.

Now that's a nice looking table and purpose built room.

It is interesting to note that the wargaming hobby, so traditional in many ways, has been at the forefront of adopting social networking platforms to engage with others about its various activities, and I suppose it should not be surprising that those platforms will change and come in and out of fashion over time.

That said I think I have detected another swing in those trends as the current world lockdown has forced most of us to rethink how we carry on with our hobby, which in the main is a very social one, certainly here in the UK, and with more time being spent at home, we have seen the rise of solo-gaming reports springing up all over the place, not to mention the painting and reading that is getting done with less other distractions, like work, to contend with.

In addition to those changes of exchanges on whatever forums, I seem to detect an increase in traffic here and on the Devon Group blog, where perhaps the varied diet of wargaming content, not just focused on one particular era or aspect of the hobby, mixed with an opportunity to get into a particular topic in a more detailed and perhaps engaging way, than simply an exchange of ideas in a group or forum, provides a more interesting reading and communication experience when people have a bit more time to sit down and discuss content.

Likewise, a lot of content on other forums still relies on those personal blogs that underpin a message referring back to a post on them, on which the detail of the subject is often found. 

If you then add to that aspect the amount of different things going on in the hobby with new rules, figures, books, the latest popular era or scale of game to do it in alongside that personal way of doing a lot of the hobby around those various topics, blogging still has a lot to say and offer as a way of exchanging ideas, that perhaps in past times was the prerogative of mainstream hobby magazines and we all know that that business is not what it was, with fewer of us willing to subscribe, preferring to buy on sight if the content in that month appeals.

Greg has a very nice collection of Seven Years War and AWI. Future plans look set to be focused on WWII 15mm,
one to one on that rather large table!


Alongside those aspects, the other key things that I feel blogging has to offer, is as an interesting way to keep a personal journal of anyone's time in the hobby that can be fun to look back over as the years and posts build up and can offer a fascinating insight into the way our personal hobby journey takes different twists and turns from one era to another from one modeling project to another and the challenges that are overcome or not which is all part of the fun.

I have done a lot of things and met a lot of people who I might not have done because of JJ's Wargames and it has allowed me an opportunity to put something back into a hobby that, as the banner at the top boldly states is a 'Passion' and thus merits a contribution from me for all the fun I have had, and the people, whose company I have enjoyed, deserve.

So, if you are thinking of having a go, there has never been a better time to start blogging. Just work out what you want to say, how often and in what form you intend to say it and make it a point to share, share and keep on sharing to get more folks who read your blog involved in our hobby.

JJ


Thursday, 7 May 2020

SPARTA, Rise of a Warrior Nation - Philip Matyszak


Book one of a two part set, this one as the title says covers the rise of Sparta from its earliest times and ends at the conclusion of the Persian wars. The first thing you notice upon opening the book is the font size, it appears to be the next size up from the norm and is definitely larger than in book two, admittedly whilst very welcoming for the elderly eyes it is a little odd.

Chapters one and two set the scene and clearly has to be based on whatever information can be gleaned from the ancient texts or later study so there isn’t a lot to go on. Generally speaking the origin stories of most ancient cities are usually based on myth and then enhanced by their citizens later to make things sound a bit more impressive, Matyszak does a reasonable job of sifting out what you can from what is passed down to us from the past.

Map of the Peloponnese

Sparta is sited in the ‘Hand’ of Greece, there are three ‘fingers’ hanging down into the Mediterranean and Sparta is in-between fingers two and three, The whole of the Peloponnese peninsula is very mountainous and fertile land is at a premium so Sparta is squeezed alongside the river Eurotas which runs north to south and originally consisted of two villages either side of the river and surrounded by mountains. This is possibly the origin of the two king system, more of which later. There was no access to a port at this time and the coast was notorious for shipwrecks so trading wasn’t a priority unlike in many other cities. Sparta didn’t even bother to develop proper coinage until near the end.

River Eurotas, Sparta originated either side of this river. wikipedia

At some time in the Bronze Age something really momentous happened in both Greece and the surrounding area of the Mediterranean causing the collapse of whole empires not just little villages and it is estimated that up to 90% of the Peloponnese was abandoned, for what little its worth my vote is on big volcano, tidal wave and the resulting change in atmospheric conditions seriously affecting farming but that isn’t relevant to this review. Enter the Dorians, who are relevant to the story as Sparta clearly identifies itself as being Doric when it suited them, who the Dorians were or where they came from is still being debated but they settled across the eastern Mediterranean in large numbers especially in the Peloponnese.

Anyway these two chapters also included fun stories of gods and double dealing and people born in eggs etc but as far as the Spartans were concerned, they were the descendants of Zeus and Taygete (daughter of Atlas), later the great-grandsons of Hercules just happen to return to reclaim their inheritance thus making the Spartans really Achaeans all along and so native to the area, which was convenient.

Map showing Sparta and Messenia : wikipedia

Chapters three and five get to the really important bit and is critical to understanding Sparta and its whole ethos. To the west over the mountains lies Messenia, this actually had some flat land and once all the pointy bits had been discounted it was still over 20 times larger than Sparta. Of course everyone knew that Messenia really belonged to Sparta because when the land was originally divided up via the choosing of lots by the great-grandsons of Hercules, the one who got Messenia cheated. Not sure I follow the Spartans reasoning here.

All ancient wars apparently took a very long time and all of them always ended in nice round numbers so it was twenty years before Sparta eventually conquered Messenia after many battles and doing some very un-Spartan things to achieve it. The Spartans were not yet the all conquering killing machines they later became; they were outnumbered by the Messenians and had the additional problem of the hostile city of Argos to the North East constantly causing trouble behind their backs.

Hence the need to do sneak attacks, bribery and suffer numerous defeats but eventually they won. Now the important bit so pay attention.

Messenia was declared public land and then sub-divided into equal lots called kleroi, each kleroi was sufficient to maintain one Spartan and his family. This Spartan wouldn’t do any actual farming of course, this was done by the conquered Messenains now known as helots (hel- means conquered /subjugated). This allowed the Spartan to concentrate full time on being a warrior, after successfully passing though the Agoge (see below) he would apply to join a soldier’s mess where he would be spending most of his time and once accepted he could then get married and if he didn’t already have one, be allocated a kleroi. Everyone in Sparta was therefore equal even the ones who were more equal than the others, when the Spartan died the land would revert to the state and be reallocated, usually to the son if there was one and if they didn’t already own a kleroi.

Ancient Sparta, note the mountains that surrounded the city

The helots hated the Spartans more than I hate playing AWI, and Spartan policy essentially revolved around maintaining control of Messenia and preventing a helot uprising, their armies when away on campaign were always looking over their shoulder and never liked to be too far away from home. The control of Messenia was critical in allowing Sparta to exist as a major city and is the actual source of their power. Once Messenia is lost it all falls to pieces.

There is much more that can be said about the Helots, they could own land, they did have money and they did fight in the army but you can look that up yourselves if interested.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helots

The huge effort needed to keep Messenia under control should have made it blindingly obvious that Sparta would be unable to do the same elsewhere but they did try to absorb the next city along which was called Tegea, even going so far as take along the chains that would allow them to measure out new kleroi. After a dreadful beating the Spartans had first hand experience of the chains as they got to wear them whilst working the Tegean’s fields, eventually the prisoners were released but the Tegeans kept the chains.

After that Sparta changed tack, their new policy was to approach each small city in turn threatening them with war unless they joined the new Peloponnesian League (controlled by Sparta of course); as the league got bigger then the request was accepted that much quicker. But I have now strayed into chapter seven.

Lycurgus

Chapter four is all about Lycurgus

Apparently everything that you know about the Spartan way of life is entirely down to Lycurgus, exactly who he was and when he was around is of course unclear but the Spartans say that it was he  who set down the laws called rhetras which covered the minutest detail of everyday life and that every Spartan would strictly follow. Conveniently for all future Spartan law implementers Lycurgus only gave these rhetra verbally and even went so far as to proclaim the Great Rhetra which forbade them from ever being written down, handy that.

According to Plutarch:

“Nothing can be said about Lycurgus without someone else disputing it. There are different accounts about when he was born, where he travelled, how he died and above all, about what he did as a law giver, No one can even agree in what times he lived”

But all the loopy things that you have ever heard about the Spartan way of life can be placed at his doorstep.

I will now briefly outline the Spartan ruling set up. There were as previously mentioned two kings, probably from the two most powerful families from the original two villages but far more likely it was someone who later claimed they were descended in that way and no one fortunately asked any embarrassing questions. The titles were hereditary within the family.

Ephors by Richard Hook

However the kings were overseen by an elected body of five Ephors, these were chosen from the Spartiates (those who held a kleroi) and they served for a year and could not be re-elected. In reality they had a lot more power than the kings as they formed state policy and upheld the laws. Underneath them was another body of twenty-eight men (plus the kings) called the Gerousia, naturally you had to be a Spartiate and be over 60 years old! You would have thought that the choice of potential candidates would be quite limited. Election was by acclamation and was for life, this body was a sort of jury who considered important law decisions and whether to veto anything that wasn’t in the public good. The kings would always lead the army regardless of whether they knew what they were doing or not and later on, after a few conflicts of interest out in the field, the Ephors decreed that from now on one of the kings must always remain behind in Sparta.

The Gerousia and the two kings debate

Chapter six is titled the making of a Spartan warrior, all well known stuff so I will skip this, if you don’t know then click the link below which outlines their education system which was called the Agoge. Failing the Agoge meant that you were not a full Spartiate and joined the next class down which was the Periokoi, free non-citizens who did actual work and therefore very un-Spartan but would of course still fight in the army when required.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agoge

Chapter seven I have already briefly outlined above and covers the formation of the Peloponnesian league with most of the peninsula signed up, Sparta then turned again to deal with the much trickier problem of Argos. This was done by lining up in battle formation outside the city the same as they had done with all the others however unlike the smaller cities Argos wasn’t playing ball and they came outside to talk things over dressed in their best armour. Both sides then had a serious think about things and agreed that maybe it would be better if only a few from each side fought it out on a last man standing agreement. Queue the famous “Battle of the Champions“ yes really.

Battle of the Champions

Dated to around 546 BC each side picked 300 of their best warriors and everyone else went home to let them get on with it undisturbed. I am sure you not be surprised to know that 597 were killed, two Argives were left and believing themselves to be the only survivors they staggered back home with the good news that they had won, later however one Spartan who was not quite dead woke up and seeing no one else alive he too staggered back home with the good news after erecting a trophy on the field.

Typical Greek Battle Trophy

When both armies returned to claim victory an argument then ensued about who had actually won, this led to blows and a pitched battle which they had all been trying to avoid in the first place, the Spartans won and so imposed their control over some more small towns. What happened to the Spartan survivor? So ashamed that he lived whilst his comrades died he returned to the battlefield where they fell and killed himself.

Chapter eight is about one of the more interesting characters, Cleomenes the mad king. Although the Ephors were very powerful a king could still do more or less what he wanted as long as he had enough backing, Cleomenes wasn’t one to sit around eating black porridge, instead he got involved in trying to overthrow many of the other cities rulers especially any democratic ones, he managed to install new leaders in Athens but needed several attempts to do so as they kept getting thrown out along with himself on one occasion, despite his many martial successes his project completion record in Attica really wasn’t very good and the Ephors were not happy, it was now that they passed the law that one king should stay behind as the shambles in overall strategy was down to the two kings disagreeing on what to do.

King Cleomenes 1st

Next he decided to attack Argos, winning the battle of Sepeia and driving the remnants into a sacred wood. Burning it down was not a wise thing to do and oddly he then didn’t attack the undefended city. Plutarch claims the city was defended by women and drove the Spartans back with heavy losses, recalled by the Ephors whose patience had now run out he was charged with bribery over Argos, he was acquitted when he claimed that the Delphic Oracle had told him to take Argos, which coincidentally was the name of the sacred wood. He did more interesting stuff including bribing the Oracle at Delphi, tried to depose the other king, fled Sparta, gathered an army to attack the city but returned under a promise of forgiveness, was arrested and then mysteriously died by slicing himself into strips.

Chapter nine, The Spartan army I will also skip over, shields, spears, armour, formations, training etc. The usual stuff.

The final chapters ten, eleven and twelve cover the Persian wars, chapter ten is on the Battle of Marathon so not much Spartan interest in that chapter as they deliberately didn’t turn up until the next day.

Thermopylae, probably a bit more realistic than the film 300

Chapter eleven covers Thermopylae, again well known stuff and rightly deserves a chapter by itself, the author quite correctly points out the importance of the simultaneous nearby sea battle of Artemesium, The battle content is very thin but I don’t think there is much more to say on it anyway.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Artemisium

The final chapter is on the Battle of Plataea and the defeat of the second Persian invasion, here the Spartans did play a major role but with King Leonidas dead at Thermopylae the allied army was led by king Number Two, Pausanias who wasn’t really that good at the soldier stuff, fortunately for him his soldiers were. After ten days sitting in the hills Pausanias decides on a night march to be nearer fresh food and water supplies, it was of course a total cock up with the Spartans who were forming the rearguard not even having begun their march when day started to break. The Persians attacked the disorganised shambles but fortunately by this time the Spartans were now the all conquering killing machine and sliced the Persians up a treat, the other allies led by the Athenians returned and joined the battle with only the Thebans, who were fighting for the Persians, putting up much resistance.

Battle of Plataea

Matysazak ends this book by saying that this victory at Plataea marked the end of the rise of Sparta and from now on it was the start of the decline, I don’t fully agree with him and after all I have played several wargames with Greeks and watched some stuff on the history channel so I should know.

I agree there are signs in the upcoming Peloponnesian war that Sparta is being left behind both militarily and commercially, you see the first signs that there is a limit to the number of Spartans available and the decline in numbers becomes very noticeable. Also their vaunted principles are broken more frequently especially when it comes to obtaining Persian funding plus the increase in corruption every time their leaders are away from the city and even starting to affect the Ephors.

But they do win a long protracted war, maintaining both their dominance over the Peloponnese and now extending it to the rest of Greece and to the Greek cities in Ionia, their power and influence has never been greater so I slightly disagree. Indeed I suggest that it is at this stage when they have over reached themselves and setbacks start to become more regular that sees the start of the decline in Sparta.

With book two ‘The Fall of a Warrior Nation’ commencing with the start of the Peloponnesian war I suppose it makes a convenient place to split the books but it does look a little like trying to avoid having a very short second book. More on this when I review it.

Overall an easy read and covers the subject well, could some of the battles have been fleshed out more? Possibly but we don’t get a lot of usable information passed down by the original sources. The book is about Sparta so no non-Spartan events get covered and then there are the maps. The map showing Sparta’s location has only three other towns named and the one set around the Ionian Sea is the only one that shows Argos, Athens Thebes but not Sparta. The other two maps are of  Thermopylae and ancient Sparta and they look like they have been drawn by a five year old on his first day of free expression, it might have been more useful if the four pages had been left blank for this very purpose. I used my Atlas of Classical History and I suggest you do something similar.

Click the link below to see if you agree with me as you are able to peek inside and see the actual maps.

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Sparta-Warrior-Nation-Philip-Matyszak/dp/1473874645

I realise this review is extra long but its not as if you have anything else to do with your time right now and I also thought that I should try to follow the apparent editorial direction of late.

I have almost finished reading book two so more anon.

Pen and Sword Publications £19.99

It’s a book that has held its price and even after three years it took me some time to find it at £15, today I see it is available on ABE Books for £13.85 which is annoying.
.
ABE Books

Hardback only
Readable pages 183
More on the price, book length and maps in the book two review (there aren’t any maps)

This has been a Mr Steve presentation.

Saturday, 2 May 2020

All at Sea - On the Stocks in JJ's Dock Yard, New Spanish Builds, Part One

The Rest of the Colossus - Carlos Parilla Penagos
https://www.carlosparrillapenagos.es/

The work continues on the current project of 1:700th ship builds as the focus shifts from the British Royal Navy to the Spanish Royal Navy and my first model in this new collection of ships, Nuestra Senora de la Santisima Trinidad or 'The Most Holy Trinity',  the mighty Spanish first rate of 136 guns.

Designed by the Irish naval architect Mathew Mullen, named Mateo Mullan after his emigration to Spain, the ship was built and launched on 3rd March 1769 in the Spanish naval base at Havana in Cuba.

The mighty Santisima Trinidad as she might have looked at Trafalgar flying the pennant of Rear Admiral Baltasar Hidalgo de Cisneros on her mizzen mast.

The ship was constructed from cedar wood and originally designed to carry 112 - 116 guns but a refit in 1795 saw the joining of her quarterdeck and forecastle to produce another fourth deck and thereby greater gun capacity, seeing her carrying 136 - 140 guns in her latter years, depending on which source you prefer to follow, making her unique for the largest number of guns carried by a ship of her type at the time.

Santisima Trinidad - Geoff Hunt
https://www.artmarine.co.uk/default.aspx

The weight of all those guns and her size brought issues with her sailing qualities, and despite a height reduction in 1778 and a reduction in guns carried to 130, she is reported to have constantly veered to leeward and heeled too much in any sort of a sea and was not particularly quick, gaining the nickname 'El Poderoso' in Spanish naval circles.


During the American War of Independence, Spain declared war on Great Britain in July 1779 and the Santisima Trinidad became the flagship of Admiral Luis de Cordova commander of the Spanish fleet.

Admiral Luis de Cordovaa

Santisima Trinidad took part in several key actions during the Anglo-Spanish war which saw the Spanish fleet operating in close cooperation with the French to take on the badly stretched Royal Navy, very much concerned with supporting British forces in America as well as defending the British mainland and other core interests.

A three view picture of the East Indiaman Royal George one of the fifty-five ships in the British convoy captured on the 9th August 1780. Francis Holman circa 1779.

On the 9th of August 1780 this overstretch was laid bare when a Franco-Spanish squadron of 31 ships of the line and 6 frigates, led by Cordova in the Santisima Trinidad, intercepted a British convoy of 63 troop transports and East and West Indiamen in the Atlantic, six days after their escort from the Channel Squadron parted company leaving them with an escort of just one ship of the line and two frigates.

Only eight ships in the convoy escaped, with the Santisima Trinidad firing on the Indiamen 'Godfrey' and 'Mountstuart' forcing them to strike, with all the captured ships being escorted into Cadiz.


With the Spanish navy very much on the offensive, a key objective was the recapture of Gibraltar which resulted in a land and sea blockade of the British possession, that forced the Royal Navy to conduct two relief convoys  in 1780 and 1781 to keep the garrison supplied and able to hold out.

In 1782, another such convoy was assembled to be escorted by elements of the Channel Fleet with 35 ships of the line, under Admiral Richard Howe, to be opposed by Cordova aboard the Santisima Trinidad and 49 Franco-Spanish ships of the line assembled in the Bay of Gibraltar.

Relief of Gibraltar by Lord Howe's fleet with HMS Victory in the centre flying Lord Howe's blue pennant from the mainmast. The Franco-Spanish fleet can be seen in the left background, anchored in Algeciras Bay and the Rock of Gibraltar to the right of Victory in the background. - Richard Patton 

Between the 11th and 18th of October, the British convoy was successfully shepherded into the Gibraltar harbour and on the 19th Cordova did his best to make best use of the wind gage to press an attack on Howe's retiring fleet, in what became known as the Battle of Cape Spartel, with the Allied van opening fire at 17.45, before the British made sail and broke contact, with it seems their newly coppered hulls giving them the speed advantage over the slower Spanish ships.


The American War of Independence was concluded in 1783 and with Revolution in France, Spain was initially allied to Britain when the French Revolutionary War started in 1793.

However the alliance was over in 1796 and Spain declared war in August, joining forces with France  forcing the Royal Navy to evacuate the Mediterranean through a combination of numbers of ships opposed against them and lost bases and allies through successful French action on land.

In November Admiral Jervis and the Mediterranean fleet were operating out of Lisbon, without a single British warship east of the Straits of Gibraltar.


In February 1797, Santisima Trinidad was now the flagship of Tiente General (Vice Admiral) Jose de Cordoba y Ramos who had become the third commander of the Spanish fleet in Cartagena within the previous six weeks.

Vice Admiral Jose de Cordoba - Naval Museum of Madrid

The new Spanish Admiral was under considerable pressure, from the new Spanish Chief Minister Manuel de Godoy, who now exercised dictatorial control over the army and navy but, being a former guards officer, seemed to have little concept of matters naval and thus the navy found itself starved of men and material with Cordoba's predecessors sacked for voicing their concerns.

These effects were marked, particularly in the numbers and experience of men that crewed the Spanish ships, with Santisima Trinidad having a crew of 900 men only able to muster 60 men who the Royal Navy would have rated as 'able-seamen', thus the 27 ships of the line and 8 frigates in Cordoba's fleet had crews packed with a preponderance of  'landsmen' and soldiers lacking in the skills, training and experience required to fight and manoeuvre their ships at sea.

The original figurehead had been a representation of the Holy Trinity, but not considered war like enough the figurehead was changed in a pre-Trafalgar refit to the Castile Lion.

Spain's new ally was pressing them to muster their fleet and join those of the French in Brest in preparation for the Combined Fleet to overcome the British Channel Squadron and potentially force the British to come to terms or face an invasion.

However before Cordoba could comply with that demand he was tasked with an additional mission to escort four urcas (merchantmen) carrying vital supplies of mercury used in the production process of refining silver and these were waiting at Malaga for an escort to Cadiz.

Nelson onboard HMS Minerve at Gibraltar - Gordon Frickers
https://www.frickers.co.uk/art/marine-art/the-trafalgar-collection/nelson-at-gibraltar/

Cordoba collected his charges and by the 5th of February was sailing through the Straits of Gibraltar, detaching the 74- gun Bahama, Neptuno and Terrible to escort 28 gunboats to Algiciras as he proceeded with the Terrible later rejoining his fleet, not before chasing the 42-gun frigate HMS Minerve commanded by a certain young Commodore, Horatio Nelson returning from a secret mission from Admiral Jervis to rescue Sir Gilbert Elliot and the British garrison left on the island of Elba after the British retreat from the Mediterranean, after which he started to make a bit of a nuisance of himself before finally detecting the position of Cordoba's Spanish fleet, and sending him on his way back to Admiral Jervis, now patrolling off Cape St Vincent, to report his information.

Sadly for Cordoba, just as his plans to drop off his charges in Cadiz seemed to have reached a conclusion, his fleet including the four Urcas were blown away from Cadiz out into the Atlantic in a violent easterly gale which lasted nearly a week, leaving his inexperienced crews exhausted and desperate to get into Cadiz themselves, to recover.

An 1847 map of the Battle of Cape St Vincent, 14th February 1797, with the inset map showing the position of the action in relation to the Portuguese coast and the port of Cadiz to which the Spanish were trying to return.
This nice but not very informative battle illustration attempts to show how Jervis got his fleet into the Spanish line as it tried to meet him, cutting off the five ships of the line (bottom left) from the rest of the Spanish fleet at the top of the illustration, with a close up of the lead six Spanish ships (bottom right) once Nelson aboard HMS Captain, got among them soon to be supported by HMS Culloden and Excellent. Santisima Trinidad can be seen among the lead ships and narrowly escaped capture.

On the 13th of February, Nelson found Jervis and confirmed previous reports that the Spanish fleet was at sea, but this time Nelson was able to give the Admiral a more precise indication of their position and at 08.00 the next morning, the 14th of February the British frigates accompanying Jervis's fleet fired signal guns as the Spanish fleet came into sight through a thinning mist.

Map of the Battle of Cape St Vincent from The History of Seapower by William Oliver Stevens and Allan Westcott

In a battle that Jervis was determined to turn into a pell-mell melee in which he expected superior British sailing and gunnery would prevail, the British fleet of 15 ships of the line managed to separate the Spanish van of 5 ships of the line and the 4 Urcas under Vice Admiral Don Joaquin Moreno aboard the Principes de Astaurias 112-guns, from the remaining 18 ships under Cordoba; now a disorganised gaggle after Cordoba had tried to make a 180 degree turn to bring his ships into line on a northerly course keeping the wind and looking to enable a turn to the east behind the British line on a course for Cadiz.

After cutting in and separating Moreno's squadron, Jervis signaled for the following British ships behind HMS Britannia to tack together rather than in succession and thus close individually on the other Spanish ships to prevent their escape, supporting each other as best they could.

HMS Britannia, with Vice Admiral Thompson commanding, failed to acknowledge the signal and continued following the Victory, seemingly prepared to turn on the same point, and Cordoba looked likely to escape until Nelson, on his own initiative, conformed with Jervis's signal, and wore round to intercept the Spanish, forcing them to meet his attack long enough for the other British ships to come up and complete the victory.


At 15.00 the Santisima Trinidad found herself engaged by HMS Culloden and Captain each of 74-guns and joined by the Spanish 112-gun San Josef and the 84-gun San Nicolas, coming to the support of their flagship engaged in an hour long battle leaving both sides with serious damage.

Battle of Cape St Vincent 14th February 1794 - Antonio de Brugada
The Santisima Trinidad is seen in the centre of the battle with her badly damaged rigging and being fired upon by nearby British warships as a Spanish 74 in the left foreground approaches to rescue the battered flagship. The picture identifies the Spanish 74 as the Infante de Pelayo, but she was not at the battle having been detached to escort the gunboats into Algaciras on the 5th February.

As other British ships came up and entered the melee, the Santisima Trinidad found herself at bay surrounded by several British ships and in the closing stages of the battle she was still putting up fierce resistance against HMS Excellence 74 guns, Blenheim 98-guns and Orion 74-guns but, with her fore and mizzen masts down and close to 200 casualties from the battering, was close to striking, but was most fortunate in that having put up a white flag, then a British flag over her own, she was ignored as Jervis signaled his fleet to cease action and regroup on the starboard tack, at which the Spanish ship rehoisted her own colours and was escorted away by other less damaged Spanish ships.

HMS Captain capturing the San Nicolas and San Josef at Cape St Vincent - Nicholas Pocock

The Spanish lost four ships of the line, two of which fell, the San Josef 112-guns and San Nicolas 84-guns, to a joint boarding by Captain Nelson on HMS Captain, added to which they also suffered 800 dead and wounded and another 3,000 prisoners aboard the captured ships. The British casualties amounted to just 73 dead and 227 wounded.

The Santisima Trinidad would live to fight another day, and would meet Nelson commanding a British fleet at Trafalgar on the 21st October 1805, her final action.


Santisima Trinidad was in the centre division of the Combined Fleet at Trafalgar, flying the pennant of Rear Admiral Baltasar Hidalgo Cisneros, astern of the French ship Heros 74-guns and ahead of the French and Combined Fleet flagship Bucentaure 74-guns, making her an obvious target as Nelson,  identified Vice Admiral Villeneuve's flagship once he hoisted his pennant at 11.45 am and signaled the Combined Fleet to open fire.

Rear-Admiral Baltasar Hidalgo Cisneros flew his pennant aboard the Santisima Trindad at the Battle of Trafalgar

HMS Victory cut the enemy line at about 12.30 delivering stern and bow rakes to the Bucentaure 74-guns and Redoutable 74-guns respectively, taking fire from the Santisima Trinidad as she passed on her port side, to turn in behind the Bucentaure sailing behind.

The gunners on Santisima Trinidad were kept hard at it, engaging Victory, Neptune, Conqueror and Africa as she became embroiled in the mass melee Admiral Nelson engineered for his battle plan at Trafalgar

Closely behind the Victory was HMS Neptune 98-guns in close support which, following the flagship in, penetrated between the Bucentaure and the Santisima Trinidad, bow and stern raking them respectively, as she passed to swing around to engage the Santisima Trinidad from the starboard side; later to be joined by the Conqueror 74-guns and Africa 64-guns as the three British ships set about battering the Spanish leviathan into submission.


Her fight with the three British ships was a valiant one, but the cost from the battering she took was high, with some 30% of her crew being hit with 205 killed and 108 wounded among which were Admiral Cisneros and her commander Captain Don Francisco Javia de Uriate y Borja.

The Lion against the Pack - Carlos Parilla Penagos
Carlos Parilla's excellent artwork captures the drama of the last battle of the Santisima Trinidad battered by HMS Neptune 98-guns to starboard, Conqueror 74-guns astern and Africa 64-guns to port
https://www.carlosparrillapenagos.es/

Don Peres Galdos book 'Trafalgar' contained a realistic account of what it was like aboard the Santisima Trinidad during the height of the action, and was based on authentic accounts drawn from official records held in the National Archive in Madrid;

'The scene on board the Trinidad was a hellish one. No attention was paid to the sails. The vessel indeed was unmanageable. The energy of all was concentrated upon the business of working the guns as quickly as possible....

The English shot had torn our sails to tatters, It was if huge invisible talons had been dragging at them. Fragments of spars, splinters of wood, thick hempen cables cut as corn is cut by the sickle, shreds of canvass, bits of iron and hundreds of other things that had been wrenched away by the enemy's fire, were piled along the deck, where it was scarcely possible to move about....


The Aftermath of Trafalgar - Thomas Butterworth

Blood ran in streams about the deck; and in spite of the sand, the rolling of the ship carried it hither and thither until it made strange patterns on the planks. The enemy's shot, fired as they were, from very short range, caused horrible mutilations. ...

The ship creaked and groaned as she rolled - and through a thousand holes and crevices in her strained hull the sea spurted in, and began to flood the hold.' 

The ship itself was left dismasted, but it was the damage to her hull that proved to be her end with a large number of her crew that were still standing forced to man the pumps, battling water rising at 18 inches an hour and would leave fifteen foot of water in her hold when, after striking, her British captors abandoned the attempts to keep her afloat.

The Santisima Trinidad was evacuated by boats from HMS Neptune, Ajax and Prince, but sadly a large number of her wounded went down with her when she sank some 21 to 24 miles off Cadiz


Santisima Trinidad was armed at Trafalgar and likely St Vincent with 136 guns with 34 x 36 pounder long guns on her lower deck, 34 x 24 pounders on her middle deck, 34 x 12 pounders on her upper deck, 18 x 8 pounders on her quarterdeck and 6 x 4 pounders augmented by 10 x 24 pounder obusiers (carronades).

Printed Sources referred to in this post:
The Trafalgar Companion - Mark Adkin
Fleet Battle and Blockade - Chatham Pictorial History

Next Up - Steve M and I concluded our game of Breakout Normandy this week and I will cover the last two days of battle we played out using Vassal, plus, with the current ship models all done and a pause whilst new models arrive on the stocks I have an update on my AWI Mohawk collection last covered back in October last year and further play in Tonnage Solitaire with the first three days of combat for Slow Convoy 48 in October 1941.