II
"In forming the plan of a campaign, it is requisite to foresee everything the enemy may do, and to be prepared with the necessary means to counteract it.
Plans of campaign may be modified ad infinitum according to circumstances, the genius of the general, the character of the troops, and the features of the country."
Perhaps the most classic illustration of this maxim in practice is the memorandum and subsequent plan of campaign as proposed by Sir Arthur Wellesley in 1808 to the British government in which he contradicted Sir John Moore's previous declaration that Portugal could not be held against French invasion, but went further to describe its role as a base to support ongoing operations, building up the Portuguese army and to aid the Spanish in ridding them of French occupation and eventual pursuit of French forces into France itself.
Following Wellesley's return to Portugal in 1809 with his plan accepted by British ministers he immediately set its principles into action by a fast campaign that ejected Soult from Oporto causing him to lose all his baggage and guns in the process, and then to turn south to link up with the Spanish Army of Estremadura to attack and destroy the next potential threat, namely, Victor's I Corps in the Tagus valley.
Whilst pursuing the objective of securing Portugal as a base of operations he had already predicted the likely victory of Napoleon over Austrian forces in the Danube campaign of that year and had given orders for work to commence on the construction of the lines of Torres Vedras, predicting that the Emperor would return in 1810 to deal with the British in Portugal once and for all.
The Lines of Torres Vedras - A master stroke in campaign planning |
The defence of Portugal in 1810-11 would become a model that was studied by the Russian General Staff and used to define their own plans to overcome a French invasion the following year, on a much larger scale. The campaign of 1812 would prove the turning point and directly influence events in the peninsula
All the points described in this maxim, foresight, preparatory counteractions, modifications due to circumstances, genius in the commanding general, making full use of the character of the troops and features of the country shine out in Wellesley's, later Wellington's plan of campaign and is a classic exemplar of why he ranks as one of the great captains
Napoleon's maxims I Frontiers
Excellent little write up. It is no doubt that Wellington was one of the great captains of the era. What he did at Waterloo to a rebuilt French army was genius. Overcoming Napoleon was no small task and he did it continually during the period. His work in India was also excellent.
ReplyDeleteHi CC, thank you. Yes the defence of Portugal is but one of a series of brilliant campaigns, starting as you say in India. Perhaps, given the constraints of the "infamous army" of 1815, the Waterloo campaign was not quite his best in getting "humbuged" right at the start that allowed Napoleon to grab the central position.
DeleteFortunately the 1815 campaign has to rank as Napoleon's worst as, apart from his early success, he just about committed every cardinal sin in the book and allowed Wellington to recover his position and set up the final clash which, with Blucher's steadfast cooperation, was a master piece and paid the Emperor back with one of his own classic flanking attacks.
I think also one of the key stand out aspects and brilliance of his generalship was that Wellington was answerable to elected ministers and public opinion and had to win the favour of both to allow him the freedom to plan and conduct his campaigns, something Napoleon never really had to consider, other than to get back to Paris now and then to avoid a potential counter coup.