Wednesday, 26 February 2020

Target for Tonight, Op Six - Mannheim Ludwigshaven


The Target for Tonight, Berlin Campaign moves well into the second half of our series of eight games with game six, the operation to Mannheim-Ludwigshaven on the 23rd-24th September 1943.

The campaign is delicately balanced with the British victory point tally pegged back over the last two games with Bomber Command starting the series with three very successful ops leaving them looking at a Major Victory, slipping to a Victory at the halfway and now resting in that range with an average of 14 victory points but only two points away from slipping further back into a draw, defined as 'Mounting losses cancel out the effects of bombing'.

Op 1 - Berlin, 23rd-24th August 1943
Op 2 - Nuremberg, 27th-28th August 1943
Op 3 - Berlin, 31st August-1st September 1943
Op 4 - Mannheim, 5th-6th September 1943
Op 5 - Hannover, 22nd-23rd September 1943

The 'pegging back' has primarily been due to a gradual improvement in Nachtjagd tactical capability, recovering from the dismantling of their tactical set up with Bomber Command's deployment of Window in the June raids on Hamburg. This recovery most amply illustrated in Op 4 to Mannheim when severe losses especially among veteran and elite crews badly damaged the game result and the campaign situation as a whole, very much the 'Black Night' for Bomber Command in our series of games.

However with an improvement in the German defences has come the inevitable effects of poor Pathfinder marking and the difficulty in bombing deep into Germany during moonless nights in very bad or bad weather conditions and the effects on that marking if it goes astray.

Thus with three games to go the campaign is very nicely balanced and very interesting to see how things will look as we get to the stage where Bomber Harris would take stock and decide to commit his force to an all out attack on the German capital in November; with half the raids from then until March 1944 focused on the city until Bomber Command was ordered to support the build up to D-Day with Berlin left battered but certainly not destroyed.

The list of historic ops that cover the period of the Battle of Berlin, where we are selecting the first eight largest raids of that period.

The Bomber Command War Diary, describes the raid on Mannheim-Ludwigshaven on 23/24 September 1943 thus;

'The raid was intended to destroy the northern part of Mannheim, which had not been so severely hit in the successful raid earlier in the month. The Pathfinder plan worked well and concentrated bombing fell on the intended area, although later stages of the raid crept back across the northern edge of Ludwigshaven and out into open country ...'

As with our rendition of the earlier raid on Mannheim our bomber commanders achieved a similar bombing result as described above, all be it with damaging losses. Thus it would be interesting to see if a similar bombing pattern could be achieved more cost effectively and would the Pathfinder marking replicate the historical result?

The target map showing the weather over the target and home airfields and Mannheim, a deep target beyond the Rhur limiting fuel and bomb load

The weather briefing seen above together with the group rosters and individual plane load outs were issued to the players who set about deciding on the fuel/bomb lift plan for the raid that settled on a minimum fuel/maximum bomb lift arrangement seeing the Lancasters of 1 and 5 groups bombed up with a maximum lift of cookies, whilst the other groups would back up with the usual mixed load of HE/Incendiary.

The roster drawn up for the Mainforce Groups with a full turn out by 4 Group Halifaxes.

The route to the target showed a planned approach straight in and straight out but coming into the enemy airspace over Wilhelmshaven to suggest a possible approach on Berlin before turning south to run straight in to the target before running back to the coast south of Amsterdam and home.

Route plan for the Op, showing RAF and Luftwaffe Nightfighters operating in the various legs of the route. The number indicates the quality of the fighter, 2 to 5 being the number added to a D10 requiring 11 or more to cause a hit.

The forecast winds over the target were from the northwest and the broken cloud would permit the use of Newhaven target markers with less propensity to drift.

Our Group Commanders decided to mark the docks as the aiming point looking to keep their bombing well up to the marker to keep the concentration close to the centre of the city.

Target map with Newhaven target markers being used and yet to be planned, allowing for the northwest wind forecast for the raid

All the groups had a mix of experienced, novice and veteran crews with 3 Group Stirlings having one of the stronger crew line ups. However there was a high proportion of jumpy bomb aimers among all the groups which could only make things difficult when looking to bomb close up to the markers.

Aircraft Ops Sheet filled out for 3-Group Stirlings ready for the raid on Mannheim

Thus with all the raid preparation done, and the aircraft bombed up, the various squadrons lined up at their respective airfields and started to roll down the runway into the darkening skies over northern England.

Aircraft assemble after takeoff with two aircraft forced to abort with undercarriage failure

It was during the take-off and assembly that Op Six suffered its first casualties, although in this case all the crews involved survived the drama which saw 1 Group Lancaster, C-Charlie, with its veteran crew on its 21st op and later that evening 3 Group Stirling, F-Freddie, another veteran crew on its 21st op both abort due to undercarriage failure to retract, with both aircraft landing safely after dumping their loads.


From the assembly to the enemy coast there were no further alarms as the stream continued on gaining altitude, testing guns and preparing for the adrenaline rush of the announcement 'enemy coast ahead' as all eyes strained in the darkness for any potential threat.

Unfortunately the mark one eyeball served no help for 4 Group Halifax K-King, another veteran crew on its 25th op and looking forward to a well earned break from operations and with a pilot showing signs of that fatigue with a developing pattern of early turn backs over the enemy coast.

This time there would be no early turn back as a III/NJG3 Me110 experten equipped with Schrage Musik approached stealthily from below and delivered a raking fire from that quarter that took out the port inner engine starting an immediate fire, but then raked back to the closed bomb bay causing a massive explosion in the night sky over the German coast.

The crew had no chance to react and probably didn't know what had hit them, as the stream, disconcerted by the flash, reported enemy starshells being used as they pressed on.


The next target for the NJG3 experten was 1 Group Lancaster B-Beer another veteran crew on its 18th op who managed to spot the German fighter on its approach and start an immediate corkscrew manoeuvre suffering hits to the port wing fuel tank and tail plane during its manoeuvre and managing to keep flying and make good its escape, later suffering flak damage and limping home after bombing with four damage die, only to succumb to all the damage on the return leg over the enemy coast, with only the bomb-aimer and mid-upper gunner escaping to be captured.

This same Me110 pilot would go on to intercept 3 Group Stirling I-Ink who would manage to escape without damage and complete their 29th op.

Stirling I-Ink corkscrewing desperately to avoid the attentions of the NJG3 experten Me110 over the German coast

The next two casualties occurred close to Kassel as 5 Group Lancaster P-Popsie's veteran crew on their 23rd op spotted the I/NJG6 Me110 closing in on it and went into an immediate corkscrew, but a short burst from the German fighter saw the starboard outer engine burst into flames and the plane went into an uncontrollable dive, with just the bomb-aimer and rear gunner able to exit the aircraft before it hit the ground.

Not J-Jug, but I-Ink the one that got away!

The same Me110 pilot would go on to claim a second victim as the stream turned near Kassel for the run into the target when 4 Group Halifax L-Leather, with a novice crew, only on their fourth op whose aircraft was badly damaged whilst corkscrewing, hitting another bomber in the stream, losing the starboard inner engine and causing a fire that a very inexperienced pilot was unable to deal with, before losing control and crashing south of the city with no survivors.

3 Group Stirling I-Ink rears up us the bombs are released over Manheim

Thus with three aircraft shot down and two aborted on take-off, the stream turned in through the flak zone without any further loss and prepared to make the approach over the target.

3 Group Stirling H-Harry makes a good central approach as it begins its bomb run over Mannheim. The number of jumpy bomb-aimers was starting to make itself felt as indicated by three earlier drops close to the lower board edge.

Right from the get-go, the bombing run got off to a poor start with jumpy and even steadier bomb aimers dropping early with Jack, Queens and Kings seeming to be making up the complete deck of cards.

All aircraft completed their runs with no go-arounds and just one aircraft straffed by a lone FW190 Wild Boar fighter that caused a few holes in the fuselage, but otherwise no damage.

6 Group Halifax T-Tommy with its crew on their 30th op looking forward to a well earned leave begins its run up over Mannheim. The Group had a good night, with all aircraft bombing and with no losses.


As the bomber stream set course for home the final flash photo of the target showed a reasonable cluster of bombing around the blue target marker, but with nearly half the bomb load dropped short leaving a lot resting on the accuracy of the Pathfinders in the poor conditions coupled with any drift from the prevailing wind.

The run home went surprisingly well, with the Nachtjagd drawn away by a spoof raid over Schweinfurt that explained the lack of freejagd Wild Boar fighters over the target which had been very evident on the previous two raids and a quiet run back to the coast with just Lancaster B-Beer, finally succumbing to damage sustained on the flight to the target.

The landing proved equally uneventful all bar 6 Group Halifax that had a 'sticky' landing that was recovered well by the pilot avoiding a likely tyre blow out and subsequent crash and the surviving crews were bussed off for debriefing by the intelligence teams.

The final photo-flash over Mannheim reveals a disappointing creep back from the target markers 

The raid picture was quickly assessed and showed a poor bombing result with nearly half the crews bombing short with creepback falling into the open fields south of the city, which was made worse by Pathfinder inaccuracy and wind drift to pull the on target bombing into the southern outskirts, just causing two major fires in the residential areas of Ludwigshafen.

The bombing results showing the fields south of the city getting a plastering from the creep back

When the victory point calculation for the raid was done it showed two major fires added to the value of the target city producing just 14 victory points to which was offset by the Nachtjagd scoring four victories yielding 12 victory points for the quality of crews lost, netting just two points for Bomber Command for this op.

Once the results of drift and inaccurate Pathfinder marking, actually marking the rail yards in the south east outskirts, were added to the mix, it revealed that the cluster of bombing in the north had in fact fallen in the south causing just two major fires for the amount or ordnance dropped

Thus the situation at the end of Op Six sees Bomber Command with 72 victory points after losses which equates to an average of 12 victory points which places the campaign into a drawn situation with two ops to play and the commentary on the campaign reading,

'Mounting losses cancel out the effect of the bombing'

However Bomber Command have two close range targets, Hanover and Dusseldorf coming up which will offer them the opportunity to bomb up with very heavy load outs, to get in and get out on a relatively short flight, hoping to score big points with fewer losses.

This will require scoring another possible 56 victory points in the next two ops to gain a victory, with the two city targets yielding 7 victory points for their value leaving another 49 points to chase requiring 12 major fires or 6 major fires in industrial areas, split between the two targets, or a combination of the two, before losses - by no means impossible having scored 48 points in the first two ops, but certainly challenging.

Next up - New 1:700th ships for my growing French fleet roll down the slipway for my current project 'All at Sea'

9 comments:

  1. A gripping read! One of those days I have to collect a few of those tiny planes as well.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Great stuff, a superbly organised campaign and games, well done!

    Cheers
    Matt

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thanks for your comments chaps.

    If you like a plane game every now and then, this is definitely a game that is different from the usual diving, turning and shooting affairs that proliferate.

    Bolting on a Campaign structure to the game rules has added further to the decision points for players now taking the role of Group Commanders and Bomber Command senior management to flying the missions that they have structured, of course never knowing what exactly the enemy, weather and pathfinder force will do to mess up those well laid plans.

    Game managing the thing has been great fun just seeing the story unfold and its not over.

    JJ

    ReplyDelete
  4. Sorry for posting belatedly on this page, but this is the only place I've seen this game being played. I was hoping you could give me a quick worked example of Step 2 in the rules (electronic advancement) as I find the rules as written hard to understand. Thanks in advance.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi, that's quite alright.

      Yes the Electronic Advancement chart can seem a bit daunting at first but the Appendix A that proceeds it should be read in conjunction if you are unsure as it provides the detailed background as to what these tactical advancements and countermeasures are exactly and how they affected the bomber operations.

      Simply put, the chart lists 'Bomber Command's' technical and tactical changes to overcome German attempts to intercept the bombers or make it more difficult for them to bomb their targets.

      German Countermeasures show the German response to those changes and when they might take effect, given that there was usually a time delay in the response, and in some cases Bomber Command came up with a counter response to overcome the German changes that followed.

      The technical advances are laid out in date order so you can determine what is the latest tactical advance that is in effect at the time of your bombing op or mission and is it still effective.

      So for example if I was running an op to Bremen in October 1942 I would know that the new Pathfinder Force are operating to lay route and target markers for this op.

      This activity will make it more likely that my bombers will find and bomb their target, however the Germans responded to this tactic by setting up dummy fire zones to draw my bombers away but I would need to roll a D10 score of 6 or more to have that countermeasure in effect for the op.

      Once that countermeasure takes effect, my bombing effectiveness will only improve with the next technical advance in December 42 when Bomber Command issues Mandrel sets to allow aircraft in the bomber stream to jam the German early warning radar, making it less likely that my bombers will be intercepted en route to the target.

      Likewise the German countermeasure will only take effect on the D10 score of 6 or more thus restoring the chances of a German nightfighter intercept along the route.

      You will find that the notes against each zone that aircraft travel in show the die score required for the risk of a navigational error on route or a nightfighter intercept and these chances will change according to what is the latest technical advancement in play that has not been superseded by an effective countermeasure.

      So you can usually ignore previous advancements once a countermeasure has taken effect, only noting the latest advance that is in effect at the time of you op.

      You will see I cover this in the pre-op planning to the players as covered in my game reports.

      Hope that helps

      JJ

      Delete
  5. That's much clearer now, appreciate the help. Safe flying!

    ReplyDelete
  6. 2 quick questions 1.When it says in the Enemy Coast Ahead section of the rules "unless attack made on lower aircraft, if outward bound and bomber gained extra height by going up the steps" what aircraft is this referring to?
    2. How do you determine if a bomber is immediately shot down if subjected to a surprise attack?
    Thanks in advance.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ok, so the reference under 'Enemy Coast Ahead' means that the bomber has been intercepted by a nightfighter (NF) and in the normal routine you would test to see if the crew spotted the NF and either 'corkscrew' which means taking the models to the nightfighter intercept board or was surprised, meaning you have the NF get a shot at the bomber, with 2D10 on the Effect of Hit table, apply the results and if the bomber survives, take the models to the intercept board and fight a corkscrew round of combat.

      The reference to 'going up the steps' refers to the 'Special Characteristics' on page 13, that has you apply crew characteristics if applicable. If the pilot of the intercepted bomber has 'climbing the steps' as his special characteristic, it is assumed that he has avoided the intercept by gaining additional altitude and the NF has intercepted some other poor sap flying below.

      Your second question is partially answered above, in that the first test of a NF intercept is to see if the crew spot the NF creeping up on them in the dark.

      They will normally spot the NF on a roll of 1-4 on a D10 or 1-6 if they are equipped with Monica/Fishpond rearward warning device. If they fail to spot they get shot up with 2D10 as described above.

      Hope that helps

      JJ

      Delete
  7. Perfect. Thanks for your help again. It's hard sometimes learning a new system solo :-)

    ReplyDelete